ModPhy Logo

 

Here is your acquisition program.

Experiments/RT/RTfoo.zip

This is the wave demo program.

Experiments/RT/RTDemo.zip

This is the kind of program I'm thinking.

If you get stuck, you can look at the hint (half of my solution). 
But if you do look, just peek at the diagram and re-implement it yourself.

Good luck!

flip

 

The marvelous experiment of Ramsauer and Townsend
concerning the anomalous cross-section of Xenon near 1 eV

 This experiment provides a beautiful demonstration of electron's wave-nature and absolutely requires the Schrodinger equation for its explanation. In short, we find that for certain energies -- energies where the electron's wavelength is equal to the size of the atom -- electrons will pass right through a class of symmetrical atoms.  The effect may only be explained using quantum mechanics and is a good "mental model" to have as you proceed to advanced courses.

We set up a target area, filled with xenon atoms, and shoot low speed (1-12 eV) electrons through it at a collecting plate.  Some of the electrons go straight through to the plate; that is our "plate current." Some of the electrons collide with the xenon atoms and are scattered into a shield which surrounds the whole device; these scattered electrons form the "shield current."

By comparing the shield current and the plate current, we would like to figure out the scattering cross section: how solid a xenon atom appears to the free electron.  For instance, it is easier for an energetic electron to "punch through" an atom than for a pokey one.  Indeed, classically this is the only variation in the cross section, and a graph of cross section versus energy appears as in the figure at right. (Under contruction -- ed.)  Unfortunately, we cannot separate the geometry of the device -- the shield and the plate have different shapes and sizes -- from the variation in cross section.

However, we can remove all of the xenon atoms from our target field, by freezing them out.  Then, we can compare the currents with xenon present to the current with xenon absent, and notice a startling, amazing fact: when the electron is the same size as the xenon atom, it goes straight through the xenon!

In fact, we can predict this effect with the Schrodinger equation (and only with the Schrodinger equation). This formula gives  the propagation of a particle -- in this case our free electron -- through space in terms of the particle's energy and the potential energy of each point in space.  It does so by describing the evolution of the probability wave function of the electron.  This formula is very deep, very fundamental, and you will spend your next year's worth of quantum mechanics exploring it. 

Now, the electron is at a lower energy when it is near the xenon atom (because of the attraction of the nucleus), and so the xenon atom is an area of lower potential energy.

A (very) crude model of the xenon's effect on the electron is that of a square well, at right.  (Under contruction -- ed.) Of course, the xenon is fuzzy (not discontinuous), has a positive nucleus, and lives in three dimensions (among many other details) but we are just going to say it is a one-dimensional square hole in the ground.  Using advanced methods, one may show that our answer is basically right anyway.

When an electron wave hits this well, part will be reflected and part transmitted.   Recall the similar example, from mechanics, of a wave on a string.  When a travelling wave hits a portion of the string with a heavier section tied in, it will be partially reflected at both the initial and final boundaries.  In our case, when the electron wave hits the well, the first transition will give a reflected wave out of phase, and the second transistion will give a reflected wave in phase with the incident wave (the figure at right is clearer).  Of course, again we are making many approximations: the electron will have a lower wavelength within the well, and the total intensity of the transmitted and reflected waves must equal that of the incoming wave.  We need the Schrodinger equation to describe these effects, and you may derive them if you are daring.

The important point, however, is that when the well is equal to one half the electron wavelength, the two reflected waves add out of phase.  The reflected wave has amplitude zero: there is no probability of reflection: there is no reflected wave.   Where does the reflected wave go? With the correct solution, we find that the transmitted wave has amplitude one; it is certain to go straight through.  That is good: our probabilities balance out to one. ("Something" is  certain to happen!)

 

 

Pre Lab Questions

  

We mentioned that the square well model neglects the facts that the xenon atom is fuzzy, has a positive nucleus, and lives in three dimensions.  Furthermore, the electron waves have different amplitudes and reduced speed within the well. Name (at least two) other important features that our model neglects.

What is the freezing point of Xenon?

What is the ionizing potential of Xenon?

What is the size of a xenon atom?  What kinetic energy should an electron have for the xenon atom to be reflectionless?

Why do we use Xenon?  Will Neon work?  Will Mercury gas?


Experiment

 RT Thyratron.gif (5926 bytes)

A note about this lab

 If you do this lab with the LabView option, the pre-lab work will take you quite some time, perhaps an afternoon or two.  This is necessary so that you come in to class with a working knowlege of LabView.  On the other hand, LabView makes the data-taking component a breeze, so you should end up doing the same amount of work in the end...   Just be sure to plan ahead.

Work through the Ramsauer-Townsend LabView tutorial.  You may collaborate with your partner, just be sure that you take turns "driving."  You have to both be familiar with the software when you come in. 

LabView Tutorial: Hello World

 This is a "throw you in at the deep end and let you swim out" tutorial. For a more gentle introduction, follow the tutorial on the LabView installation CD or available in the PMCL.

The first thing to do in any language is to write a "hello world" program.   Start LabView, and pick "New VI" from the opening panel.  Two windows will open, a front panel and a diagram.  In LabView, you assemble your interface on the front panel, and fill in the "guts" of the program on the back panel.

Assemble the following circuit.

HelloPanel.gif (4879 bytes)HelloDiagram.gif (6307 bytes)

Hit "run" and greet the world of LabView programming :-)

Hello.gif (1296 bytes)

Simulation of square-well scattering

 You are now ready to write a useful LabView program.   LabView is actually quite good at simulation; we will use it to simulate the scattering of a wave off a  square-well potential. 

Download the starting template and extract the LabView file.

The Schrodinger equation predicts that the electron will travel through space as a wave   

When the wave function encounters the discontinuity, part of the wave is reflected and part is transmitted. 

Later, you will find the amplitude of each wave from the Schrodinger equation.   You can also treat the fact that the particle's wavelength changes as it enters the well.  But for right now, forget all that.

If you recall the example of a wave on a string, when the wave encounters

At a free end, the rope comes up, comes back down, and the wave leaves in the opposite direction with the opposite amplitude.  At a fixed end, the wave is reflected with the same amplitude: a positive pulse encounters a fixed end and leaves positive.

For our square well potential, or for the section-of-lighter-string-tied- to-heavy-string example, you get a reflection at each transition in the string. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Procedure


Analysis

  

Present a good visual description of what is means by cross section and why it might vary with energy. For a long report, you should rederive the equations for the scattering cross-section as in Kukolich.

It is necessary to explain the reflection at some level, although you are not required to solve the Schrodinger equation problem. 

Why do we see only one minimum? Is the reason experimental or fundamental?


References

  

"Townsend, Sir John Sealy Edward" Brittanica Online. http://www.eb.com:180/cgi-bin/g?DocF=micro/600/62.html


Procedure

  

   RT Thyratron.gif (5926 bytes)
Circuit Diagram

 

Home Up Next

Search this website

This page is part of the UT Modern Physics
home page (http://mrflip.com/teach/courses/modphy/).
(c) '99 P. Kromer (flip@physics.utexas.edu).
Fair (e.g. educational) use only, please.