 |
Atomic Spectroscopy Experiment |
AS |
|
If you bombard a pure sample of an element with electrons, the atoms of the sample will
reradiate the energy they absorb. You will find that the light emitted consists of
discrete wavelengths of light, and that the wavelengths are unique for each element or
chemical compound. The figure on the right, for instance, gives some of the spectral lines
of Hydrogen and Helium. The light does not come in bands or preferred ranges of
emission: as you can see, they are sharp peaks to at least one part in 106 or
107. How does the atom decide what wavelengths to radiate? What could make one
energy preferable to another? It is not a feature of light itself, for it is easy to
generate continuous spectra (e.g. by blackbody radiation), and because the spectra are
unique to each atom. Furthermore, the lines may be determined with great accuracy, and are
independent of the temperature, pressure, and physical state of the element. Thus, the
source of this "fingerprint" must be intrinsic to the atom.
There are patterns in each elements series of emission lines. Balmer and Rydberg
found an ad-hoc formula that matched many (but not all) of the observed lines of Hydrogen,
and even predicted others. However, this only highlighted a pattern it did nothing
to explain the origin of this mystery.
The Bohr model of the atom, on the other hand, not only gave a physical explanation for
this pattern, but also made predictions and suggested further investigations.
"This is the famous Bohr formula by any measure the most important result
in all of Quantum Mechanics. Bohr obtained it in 1913 by a serendipitous mixture of
inapplicable classical physics and premature quantum theory." (Griffiths,
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, p 136)
The Bohr model was historically indispensable: it led directly to the
DeBroglie wave hypothesis and the development of the Schrödinger equation. However, it
does not correctly predict the spectra of elements beyond hydrogen, and cannot be easily
modified to do so. Even for hydrogen, it cannot predict the relative amplitudes of the
spectrum peaks. It certainly cannot account for allowed/forbidden transitions, or the
spectra of molecules.
 |
 |


Figure AS-1: Selected Spectral Lines Visible in Air. Source: CRC 63, pp.
E241-E243 |
|
|
All these shortcomings notwithstanding, the Bohr
model gives the best mental picture of what "happens" inside an atom. Its
quantitative details are absolutely true: electrons are only found at definite, discrete
energies and momenta; a transition between energy levels corresponds to absorption or
emission of a photon; the energy of that photon is found with the Planck-Einstein formula
E= h f / lambda
|
|
 |
Procedure
notes |
 |
|
You will take the spectrum of hydrogen and helium, and use the accepted values for their
spectral lines to calibrate the monochromator. You will then be able to identify an
unknown gas just by observing its spectrum. |
 |
|
A gas-discharge tube is used to generate the spectrum. The tube applies a large electric
field to the low-pressure gas within the tube. This ionizes the gas: a significant
fraction of the atoms will separate into an ion and a free electron. Recombination and
collisions can leave an atom in an excited state; those atoms will subsequently return to
a lower state and radiate a photon of characteristic wavelength.The lab has a homemade
and intentionally crude monochromator (built to the plans in Parkinson 1976)
to read this spectrum. As you turn the micrometer handle, you rotate the grating to move
the spectrum across the exit slit. A photomultiplier tube, mounted on the exit slit,
measures the intensity.
Before you start, you can pull the cover off the monochromator (with the high voltage
off!) and find the spectral lines by holding a card if front of the exit slit. While
youre in there, check out the construction of the monochromator. While performing
this lab, you have to be very careful about alignment: if the lens or spectrum tube moves,
you get to start over. So tape everything down. Also, if you reverse direction while
scanning, the first micrometer ticks will just be to take up any slop in the linkage
this is called backlash and so all your data should be taken in one
direction only.
Help us out by observing these guidelines:
 | You should run the PMT supply at 1.0 kV. PMT supply voltage is a tradeoff between
intensity (higher voltage lets the PMT detect smaller signals
), noise (
but it
magnifies the background noise
) and operating life (
and continued operation
at high voltage ablates the cathode, which kills the PMT). One kV is the best compromise. |
 | As far as possible, try not to run the bulb for extended times try to turn it off
and let it cool periodically. The gas is at low pressure and gets slowly contaminated
during warm operation. Also, avoid looking directly at the bulb, and cover everything with
blackcloth. The bulb puts out potentially harmful UV radiation |
 | Do not take the cover off, or otherwise expose the PMT to large light levels, while the
high voltage is on. You will saturate the PMT, which can destroy it (bad for us) and will
make the measurements very noisy for up to a half-hour (bad for you). |
|
 |
Points to consider during your
analysis  |
 |
|
Remember the cardinal rule of data analysis: details improve credibility. Take full,
careful data sets. Highlight anomalies in your data. Explain the features that you can and
point out the features you cannot. This leads to a convincing, interesting report in a way
that glossing over inconsistencies cannot. How well does the Bohr model predict the
spectrum of each element? Be specific about which features of the Bohr model hold for all
elements; and explain why the others fail. How is the reading on the ammeter related to
the light intensity?
|
|
 |
References  |
 |
|

Parkinson, P.D. S. Am. J. Phys. 35 (1967), 1032. Details the construction of the
monochromator.

Moore, J.H., C.C. Davis, S. C. Greer, and M. A. Coplan. Building Scientific Apparatus,
2nd Edition (Addison Wesley 1989). A lot of great information on everything from
glassblowing to photomultiplier tubes.

Preston, D.W. and Dietz, E.R., Art of Experimental Physics (Wiley 1991) , p 127,
329, 379. Advanced for this class but often contains useful information.

Photomultiplier Handbook (Burle Industries). You can get this free from Burle
Industries (although it lists a 14.95 "optional price"); we have a copy
available in the lab. It has everything you want to know about PMTs.

Mellisinos, A. Experiments in Modern Physics (Academic Press 1966).

Born, Max. Atomic Physics (Blackie and Sons 1957). Modern physics from one of its
pioneers.
 |
|
|